by Darrel_Griffin » 28 Sep 2024 15:00
Point 3 still needs doing - hopefully this should be quick and easy, as it's just one page, with 2 corrections, namely 2 instances of 79:54 -> 79:57.
That should be the last thing, as apart from that, I am not aware of any other issues with any of these pages.
Yes, my link for point 4 was wrong - somehow an extra "4" was appended to the end. I don't know how this happened, as I was copying and pasting these links. Apologies for that.
Yes, this has been lot of work fixing this. I must admit that when I made the original post, I did not realise that it would open up such a Pandora's Box of issues to be corrected! However, it seems that this is an inevitable effect of the way the database is set up, with lots of duplication of data on multiple pages. In theory, I guess the database could work differently, with such information held in one place and accessed by multiple pages. This would make correcting errors much simpler and quicker, as there would be just one piece of data to correct each time, rather than manually correcting every one of the multiple instances. However, this would require a major overhaul of the entire database system, which would be an enormous amount of work, and which might introduce new problems of its own. I know very little about databases myself, so I certainly don't have the expertise required. Realistically, I don't envisage this happening any time soon, so I guess for the foreseeable future we are stuck with the current time-consuming procedures.
Anyway, thanks James for all your work on this so far - just one more small step to cross the finish line!