Moderator: Forum Team
I bought the Blade blu recently, and it was superb.
Jim_Mcdonaugh wrote:I bought the Blade blu recently, and it was superb.
Blade (1997)?
1998, but yes, that one.
Leigh_Riding wrote:I have the UK Warner version. Looks great on my tv.
Leigh_Riding wrote:Samsung 40" LED. Sony blu
Leigh_Riding wrote:But I don't have a 65" tv. I have a 40" TV, therefore everything looks fine on my Blade disc. So I'm happy.
Everyone don't have tv rooms or living rooms the size of a football field.
I have a 46" tv and that's by far the biggest still enjoyable to watch in my reasonably small living room.
why it's been held up when the other two have been released.
*sigh* Fine, I'll indulge the little conversation.
It's strange because Rush Hour 2 was by far the most successful in the series, and it's odd not to capitalise on that when the first was recently reeased.
I'm assuming Bad Boys 2 is 'not worth it' when it comes to blu as well?
That's got to be one of the most anticipated 'blow-your-socks-off with the A/V' releases when it comes down to it.
Or is that wrong, because you didn't particularly care for that one either?
Jim_Mcdonaugh wrote:*sigh* Fine, I'll indulge the little conversation.
It's strange because Rush Hour 2 was by far the most successful in the series, and it's odd not to capitalise on that when the first was released.
The first one is way better.
Where i that sentence did I say better? I never and would never say it's better. I said more successful.
Return to DVD & Blu-Ray Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 64 guests