Little Buddha (1993) FIXED

Corrections to existing comparisons can now be submitted here!

Moderator: Forum Team

Forum rules
  • Please keep the maximum number of correction threads you have open to three at a time.
  • Do not put UPDATE or UPDATED in the title of your submissions.

Little Buddha (1993) FIXED

Postby Darrel_Griffin » 11 Sep 2024 12:17

Little Buddha (1993)

DVD:
https://www.dvdcompare.net/comparisons/ ... p?fid=5174

Blu-ray:
https://www.dvdcompare.net/comparisons/ ... ?fid=51247

UHD:
https://www.dvdcompare.net/comparisons/ ... ?fid=69580

For all of the above pages, in the GENERAL NOTES section, the opening phrase does not make grammatical sense:

"The modern day portions of the film was photographed were shot in anamorphic 35mm..."

By the way, although I cannot be sure, I think the reason the Siddharta scenes were shot in 65mm was because some of the shots were subsequently digitally scanned to enable visual effects work. These effects were quite complicated, including morphing and simulated reflections, and they probably wanted to maximise the resolution to facilitate good results. At the time, I was working for CFC who did this effects work, although it was over 30 years ago, so my memories are somewhat vague, plus I was quite a junior member of staff at the time, so I wasn't privy to all of the technical decision making.
Darrel_Griffin
 
Posts: 592
Joined: 08 Jun 2014 10:45

Re: Little Buddha (1993)

Postby Eric_Cotenas » 11 Sep 2024 22:32

Fixed.
Eric_Cotenas
Rewind Moderator
Rewind Moderator
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: 21 Oct 2006 10:08
Location: california


Return to Comparison Corrections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

cron