![]() |
The Film
![]() ![]() New South Wales, Australia. Following the discovery of a partially-burnt female corpse in an abandoned car on a beach, investigating detective Morris (Rod Mullinar) calls in retired detective Thompson (Ray Milland). Thompson clashes with Taylor, the younger, more corporate-minded lead detective on the case, who believes the dead woman – who suffered a gunshot wound to the head before being bludgeoned to death, her face shrouded with a towel, her body wrapped in yellow pyjamas and partially-burnt – was the victim of what he calls a ‘sex maniac’ with a ‘castration complex’. Thompson has a different opinion, believing there is a much more rational motivation behind the murder and accusing Taylor of being too obsessed with trendy psychoanalytic theory. The investigation is intercut with the story of Linda (Dalila di Lazzaro; named Glenda in the Italian version of the film), the murdered woman. Linda has three lovers: wealthy professor Henry Douglas (Mel Ferrer; a doctor in the Italian version), Danish immigrant Roy Conner (Howard Ross) and Italian immigrant Antonio Attolini (Michele Placido), who is introduced to Linda by Roy. Linda falls pregnant but is unsure who the father is. She persuades Antonio that he is the father of the baby, and he proposes to her. Linda agrees to marry Antonio but suffers a miscarriage. Antonio supports her but afterwards, Linda quickly becomes frustrated with their proletarian existence, desiring to return to her relationship with the wealthy Henry. She leaves Antonio for Henry, but Henry turns her away. Distraught and hit with the realisation that her promiscuity has alienated her from everyone, Linda takes up an offer made to her by a sleazy man in a roadside café: in exchange for a hundred dollars, she sells her body to the man, his friend and a 13 year old boy who is travelling with them. Meanwhile, egged on by Roy, Antonio is on the hunt for his wife. ![]() After the police failed to identify the corpse, they had it preserved in a bath of formalin at the Sydney University Medical School where the body was put on public exhibition in the hope that a member of the public would be able to identify the victim. One of the key features about the body were the yellow pyjamas with which the body was found; the pyjamas had a dragon embroidered upon them, and at the time of Great Depression the luxuriousness of these pyjamas set the victim apart from the bulk of society. The presence of the pyjamas with the corpse led the case to be known as the ‘pyjama girl case’. After ten years, the corpse was claimed to be that of one of two women: Anna Philomena Morgan or Linda Agostini. Evidence of a dental examination pointed to Linda being the most likely identity of the body. In 1944, Linda Agostini’s husband Tony, an Italian immigrant to Australia, returned to the country after being held as a POW in the Second World War, and after being questioned by the police he confessed to the murder of his wife: Agostini claimed he shot her accidentally and then, in a fit of panic, drove the body to the countryside and set it alight in the hope of destroying any evidence that might implicate him in the death of his wife. However, in 2004 a book by historian Richard Evans, entitled The Pyjama Girl Mystery, suggested that though Agostini had confessed to murdering his wife and dumping her body, certain details point to the corpse discovered in the pyjama girl case not being that of Linda Agostini: in particular, Linda and the corpse had different coloured eyes. ![]() The film presents a dual narrative: the first of these is the poliziesco all’italiana-like investigation into the corpse discovered on the beach, led by Morris and Taylor but assisted by amateur sleuth Thompson – a retired detective who has emigrated from Canada to Australia. This takes place in the diegetic present and is intercut with scenes from the life of Linda (named ‘Glenda’ in the Italian version of the film) and her relationships with three lovers: wealthy doctor Henry, and immigrants Roy and Antonio, the latter of whom she marries. These events take place in the past, in terms of the film’s diegesis, though a first-time viewer might be forgiven for believing that these two narrative strands, intercut with one another, are taking place at the same time. (What gives the game away, more than anything else, is the use of ellipses in the narrative strand featuring Linda: lines in the dialogue allude to the passage of weeks and even, at certain point, months, whilst the investigation of Thompson, Taylor and Morris takes place over a much more compact period of time.) ![]() By contrast, Thompson’s methodology involves plenty of legwork and speaking with grassroots experts: Thompson sneaks a few grains of rice, found on the body, out of the lab and visits restaurants in order to determine the precise type of rice and where it may have come from. As the film starts, Thompson is shown to be a keen horticulturalist, but he is frustrated with his retirement: ‘I want to work again’, he says, ‘I’m standing around doing nothing but climbing up walls’. However, chief inspector Nottingham (Antonio Ferrandis) tells Thompson to ‘enjoy your old age […] Times have change. Modern delinquents are a different breed’. Nottingham continues, offering some subtle foreshadowing: ‘Age isn’t on your side and God knows what you might run into with a case of this kind’, he tells the ageing sleuth. Shortly afterwards, Thompson meets Taylor in a restaurant and tells him, ‘In the old days, a policeman didn’t sit with his back to a window. Some hoodlum could get it in his head to shoot you from a car’. It’s a line of dialogue that offers a very subtle moment of prolepsis towards a plot point that attempts to capture something of the effect of the extraordinary coup de theatre that Hitchcock achieved in Psycho (1960). ![]() In the sequence in which the corpse is preserved in formalin and put on display, like the real corpse at the centre of the 1934 case, La ragazza dal pigiama giallo offers a deeply mealy-mouthed critique of patriarchal voyeurism. Using a telephoto lens, the camera picks out the leering faces of the – mostly male – crowd that have gathered to see the naked corpse, the queue stretching into the distance. Some of the visitors try to take photographs of the body (but are stopped by the police), and others sneak furtive glances at its genitals. Thompson is critical of this idea (‘I suppose you’ll charge admission’, he says dryly when he first hears of the idea), and as Thompson is the guiding voice for much of the film, we share his cynicism; but the film is intent on having its cake and eating it, the camera caressing the naked female body on display – and later, when Linda is cajoled into selling herself in exchange for money, the film highlights the discomfort within this moment but, accompanied by Riz Ortolani’s pounding Moroder-esque disco score, it is presented as a subtly sleazy delight. An earlier scene seems metonymic of the film’s conflicted approach to this theme: when Thompson and Taylor question Quint after discovering that he was the one who dumped the cars on the beach, on his way out Thompson stops and stares at pages that Quint has torn out of a pornographic magazine and pasted to the walls of his workshop. Thompson’s fascination with these images is broken only when Taylor interrupts him and reminds Thompson that they must leave. As he exits, Thompson condescendingly tells Quint to ‘enjoy yourself’ and makes the sign for male masturbation. Like Thompson, the film criticises the male gaze whilst at the same time revelling in it. ![]() After the release of Mogherini’s film, a novel based on the screenplay was published in 1978. The novel was by Hugh Geddes (a pseudonym of the writer and filmmaker Hugh Atkinson) and titled The Pyjama Girl Case; Geddes’ adaptation emphasised the more sleazy elements of Mogherini’s film.
Video
![]() This presentation is billed as based on a 2k restoration from the original negative. For the most part, the film’s photography employs focal lengths within the ‘normal’ range. Detail is largely excellent, with a very pleasing level of fine detail being present within the image. A small handful of scenes seem to have been shot with a seemingly shonky zoom lens which seems to have produced/suffered with some sort of chromatic aberration (see the seventh of our full-sized screengrabs, at the bottom of this review). There is little damage other than some faint vertical lines that appear at the extreme right of the frame in a few scenes. Colours are rich and consistent: most of the film has a very naturalistic palette, but coloured gels (alternating green and red) are used in one sequence, and these primary colours are communicated with a strong sense of consistency. Contrast levels are very good, with defined midtones that display plenty of definition; moving into the shoulder, highlights are even, and there is some fine gradation into the shadows. Low light scenes far very well. Finally, a solid encode to disc retains the structure of 35mm film. Some full-sized screengrabs are included at the bottom of this review. Please click to enlarge them. ![]() ![]() ![]()
Audio
![]() The English and Italian tracks are slightly different in places, including some of the character’s names (Professor Henry becomes Doctor Henry; Linda becomes Glenda; Buckingham becomes Nottingham) and histories (where Roy is identified as Danish in the English dialogue, he’s German in the Italian dialogue). Both tracks are post-synched, but the majority of the actors seem to have been speaking English on the set, and the Italian track loses Milland and Ferrer’s voices; but on the other hand, the Italian track is sometimes a little stronger, containing some slightly more profane dialogue in places and offering a more frank discussion of Linda/Glenda’s planned abortion.
Extras
![]() - An audio commentary with critic Troy Howarth. Critic Troy Howarth offers a discussion of the film that is packed with information about the various participants. Howarth’s appraisal of the film is balanced and acknowledges the picture’s weaknesses. - ‘Small World’ (28:30). Critic Michael Mackenzie reflects on the way in which examples of the thrilling all’italiana or giallo all’italiana (depending on your term of preference) explored themes of globalisation/internationalism – through the narratives of the films and the films’ status as international coproductions with cast members of various nationalities. - ‘A Good Bad Guy’ (31:46). A new interview with actor Howard Ross is included. Ross reflects on how he came to be involved in the film – and Mogherini’s insistence he play the ‘bad guy’ – and discusses his participation in it. He talks about his relationships with the other cast members, and he reflects on his relationship with his agent. Ross speaks in Italian; optional English subtitles are provided. - ‘A Study in Elegance’ (23:17). In a new interview, Alberto Tagliavia, the film’s editor, discusses his work on the picture. (Tagliavia was the editor on most of Mogherini’s pictures, so had a strong working relationship with the director.) Tagliavia reveals that, in his opinion, the plot of the picture ‘is not very special’, and consequently the film was edited and re-edited three times – the first time as a ‘straight’ giallo all’italiana, with the second and third edits changing the picture into a non-linear experience. Tagliavia speaks in Italian; optional English subtitles are included. - ‘Inside the Yellow Pyjama’ (15:04). In another new interview, the picture’s AD Feruccio Castronuovo, recollects working on the picture, which he describes as ‘a thriller with some pretty shocking scenes in it’. Castronuovo speaks in Italian; optional English subtitles are included. - ‘The Yellow Rhythm’ (21:24). Riz Ortolani speaks about his work as a composer of film scores, in an archival interview. Ortolani reflects on how he came to be a composer and discusses some of the films which he scored. Ortolani speaks in Italian; optional English subtitles are included. - Gallery (16 images). - Trailer (3:55).
Overall
![]() Arrow’s new Blu-ray presentation of the film contains an excellent, very filmlike presentation of the main feature alongside an impressive array of contextual material. The interviews with the participants are most enlightening – particularly the interview with Tagliavia, the editor of the picture. Please click to enlarge: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||
![]() |